Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
|
os:solaris:install [2009/02/18 22:00] admin |
os:solaris:install [2009/02/28 15:21] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| * [[http://www.opensolaris.org|{{http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/buttons/innomat_os_blk_180.gif|OpenSolaris: Innovation Matters}}]]: this version is less stable and hence more up-to-date. It can be seen as a developer version of Solaris, supporting newer hardware and software. It is easier to install and use on desktops than Solaris. | * [[http://www.opensolaris.org|{{http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/buttons/innomat_os_blk_180.gif|OpenSolaris: Innovation Matters}}]]: this version is less stable and hence more up-to-date. It can be seen as a developer version of Solaris, supporting newer hardware and software. It is easier to install and use on desktops than Solaris. | ||
| * FIXME Nexenta OS, etc. | * FIXME Nexenta OS, etc. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^ Operating System ^ Installation ^ Stability ^ End-user community ^ End-user peripherals support ^ ZFS ^ Performance ^ | ||
| + | | Solaris 10 | Ok | Very stable, but beware patches: I once got my system in a bad situation because a buggy patch would not install ! | Small, but people are helpful | Limited | ZFS is supported. ZFS boot is integrated in the install of Solaris 10 u6 | Fast and reliable | | ||
| + | | OpenSolaris 2008.11 | Easy | I have had no crash so far | Good and helpful | Good, though my Wacom tablet remains unsupported | ZFS and ZFS boot are integrated to OpenSolaris. ZFS snapshots are great | I encounter a few lags but I haven't found their origin yet | | ||
(c) A. Apvrille - 2009